snowywolfowl: (Default)
snowywolfowl ([personal profile] snowywolfowl) wrote2010-10-08 08:18 am

In true Mythbusters fashion, I'm going to call this one...plausible!

I just wanted to thank everyone who responded to my question regarding that Emily Dickinson poem and the use/meaning of the word "surge". While I'm not 100% convinced she's talking about boobies, I've got to admit that she could very well be referring to the feminine shape, especially if their isn't any structural term called "surge" that lace would somehow partner up with.

So, once again, thanks, and if anyone else has any alternative interpretations feel free to toss them in.

:-)

[identity profile] sarahbellem.livejournal.com 2010-10-08 06:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I can't get over the feeling that it could be an alternate spelling of "serge" which is a type of fabric. I have seen pre-19th c. spellings of the word that are spelled "surge", so it's possible that it could be spelled that way by Dickinson.

But that's less poetic, and weirder to try and interpret, so... yeah.

ETA: Wikipedia's entry on serge describes it as a sturdy twill, usually wool, used for military-type garments. The fact that it's a twill means it's sturdy enough for corsetry, and in fact, serge was used in corsets in the 19th c. The fact that she mentions lace, and it seems pretty clear she's referencing a corset lace and not lacy-lace, could indicate she's making a play on words between "surge/serge".

Sound plausible?
Edited 2010-10-08 18:08 (UTC)

I think this is the Rosetta Stone here...

[identity profile] snowywolfowl.livejournal.com 2010-10-09 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
"The thought beneath so slight a film
Is more distinctly seen,---
As laces just reveal the serge,
Or mists the Apennine."

Yeah, it does sound very plausible. If I change the spelling from "surge" the verb to "serge" the physical item we get three visualized objects that are obscured by translucent (or at least not completely opaque) items. While I'm not sure I'd say it's corset lace due to the imagery of the other two objects being covered it could be a shawl, or something similar.

It makes sense, and would be the type of thing Dickinson would do. Her work may look morbid and simplistic at first glance, but I'm finding it full of intricate and subtle word usage and thought. She's easily my favourite author I've been introduced to this year so far.

Thanks Sarah. I think my class may be singing your praises next Wednesday. :-)